Gain Collins stupidly writes in her new New York Times column:
Thanksgiving is next week, and President Bush could make it a really special holiday by resigning.
Seriously. We have an economy that’s crashing and a vacuum at the top. Bush — who is currently on a trip to Peru to meet with Asian leaders who no longer care what he thinks — hasn’t got the clout, or possibly even the energy, to do anything useful. His most recent contribution to resolving the fiscal crisis was lecturing representatives of the world’s most important economies on the glories of free-market capitalism.
Putting Barack Obama in charge immediately isn’t impossible. Dick Cheney, obviously, would have to quit as well as Bush. In fact, just to be on the safe side, the vice president ought to turn in his resignation first. (We’re desperate, but not crazy.) Then House Speaker Nancy Pelosi would become president until Jan. 20. Obviously, she’d defer to her party’s incoming chief executive, and Barack Obama could begin governing.
As a bonus, the Pelosi presidency would put a woman in the White House this year after all. On the downside, a few right-wing talk-show hosts might succumb to apoplexy. That would, of course, be terrible, but I’m afraid we might have to take the risk in the name of a greater good.
Ed Morrissey of Hot Air expertly takes Gail Collins to task by stating that Collins shows a remarkable ignorance of the President’s schedule, the Constitution, and America’s government. Also, Nancy Pelosi, if she were the President, would have to select her Cabinet members and other White House staff. Nancy Pelosi would have to wait until Congress confirmed the nominations of her Cabinet. If Gail Collins fancies herself as a feminist, she would like Nancy Pelosi to take orders from the next man who will be President and let Barack Obama be the President-by-proxy. Yes, that will go over well with women’s rights groups.
Gail Collins continues to write in her column that her plan would be disadvantageous for Barack Obama! Collins admits that Barack Obama would be rushed into his Presidency and that his transition “will not be the best in history”. Why would she write this idiotic entry if her call for President Bush’s resignation serves no purpose? Does she want to embarrass the New York Times even further? Columns written by stupid liberals such as Gail Collins is the second reason why the profitability of the New York Times has slumped (and the first reason is because the New York Times fits to print America’s military, political, and government agency secrets).
Gail Collins, representing all liberals, once again admits the stupidity of liberals and liberalism.